2
1

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

Here come the indies

Apple announced today that it has signed licensing agreements with three of the largest European independent music labels, Beggars Group, Sanctuary Records Group and V2. Furthermore, it is planned to add many more independent labels soon.

At the time of writing, there is not much available on the store. I suspect it will take a little while to get everything up there.

2
1

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

Charlotte Hatherley: Kim Wilde; Summer

Two tracks of the day today!

Somehow you know that with a name like Charlotte Hatherley, you ain’t going to get some kind of Slipknot derivative. Likewise, you ain’t going to get some R&B / Pop / Diva type either. What you get instead are the first two singles from Charlotte’s debut album Grey Will Fade due out in August 2004.

Charlotte is the pretty one from Ash and these two tracks sound a lot like The Primitives if they’d, um, been Ash instead. I think I know what I mean. Kim Wilde is the more bouncy of the two tracks, with some lovely wiggily guitar work, effects and start / stop drum patterns (think sub-50 Foot Wave) which syncopate with the guitar work. Plus you get some “ba-ba-baa-oos” which is to be expected for something as shimmery as this. Summer is a little more traditional. This time you get some “who-a”’s instead.

Download Kim Wilde for free from her website.

1
6

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

You Too?

A rough cut of U2’s forthcoming album has been stolen whilst they were on a photoshoot in Paris. So U2 are moaning that they’ve lost two years’ work and are concerned that the album will be released onto the internet.

The rough cut of the album was actually on a CD that U2 guitarist “The Edge” had. It was the CD that was stolen. Not the master tapes or studio sessions. Nor did someone wangle a feed from the mixing desk either. This puts the issue into perspective. Sure it’s bad news for them and their record company, but isn’t it a little bit reckless to carry around something that could undo two year’s work if it gets into the wrong hands?

Next time: carry it around on one of those MP3 keyrings you can buy for about £60.

1
5

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

Me again

If there’s one thing I cannot stomach, it’s erroneous reporting. Macnn is read by a number of people who jump on it at any opportunity. This is mainly due to its tendency to misread or misunderstand articles and then quote or summarise accordingly. However, Macnn sometimes doesn’t correct stories.

The on-line version of BBC News does correct errors quickly in response to reader feedback. Because I’m interested in all things Apple, I provide feedback to them whenever they report something wrong. The first time I did this was when they confused iTunes with the iTunes Music Store and it was correctly very quickly.

Today they reported on Apple’s Q3 profits which remarked that they produce colourful computers. I provided them with some minor feedback noting that they stopped producing the coloured iMacs sometime ago (July 2002) and outlining their current range. Sure enough, they’ve now reported that “the company, which produces the must-have gadget as well as computers famous for their stylish design…”

I can’t argue with that :-)

1
4

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

BT: Blue Skies

It’s always nice to hear Tori Amos and this is a track which far outshines Armand van Helden’s remix of Tori’s Professional Widow. Blue Skies (taken from BT’s R&R: Rare and Remixed album, but also appearing in an extended version on the re-release of BT’s Ima album) is a bit of a mixed bag. Starting off all Underworldy, it then goes a little bit acid-loopy, before finishing off with a housey piano stompathon.

Tori’s vocals were recorded during a soundcheck before one of her gigs and she has been known to sing snippets of Blue Skies live.

1
2

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

Early doors

As one door closes

There’s so much in this little article that makes sense. There’s also a lot of it that rings true with my experiences. Funny how things work out the same way regardless of the discipline you work in.

1
1

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

Off the Job

I get sent CVs from potential employees all the time. Most of these are traditional, paper-based CVs. Perhaps one in ten of these are any good. The rest are devoid of useful information. I’m not interested in the positions that people held, or what projects they worked on. I’m interested in how they applied their skills to their role, what they achieved, what they learnt and how they contributed to the success (or failure) of the projects they were working on. Sometimes I get sent CVs by e-mail. These are usually of the same dismal quality.

People who are looking for graphic design or web designer positions sometimes have their own on-line portfolio. I tend to visit these rather than look at the CVs. To date, I’ve not seen one that indicates they could bring anything new, interesting or innovative to my company. Why is this? Well, the main reason is the work is either too focused in one specific area, e.g. Flash animation, or their portfolio does not look good, that is, either their own website, or those they’ve produced for other people.

As a case in point, today I received an e-mail from someone who has a “lot of creative energy and a history of delivering projects to the highest standard”. So I visited their website and this is what I found:

  • A initially visually appealing website. Good.
  • No on-line samples of work. Just a placeholder for samples. No matter of clicking on the various sections gave me any links to websites, graphic design, print work or anything.
  • At this stage I thought maybe it was a browser issue. So I switched browser and found that the site is full of JavaScript errors. Now, I’m quite open to graphic designers not knowing much about web design. But this person promotes web design on their website and refers to the website as the primary source of information. Very bad news.
  • I then found their CV, under the ‘Contact’ section. Of course. But no telephone number either on the website, or the CV. Whilst I could read the Microsoft Word version of the CV, it was poorly laid out, written in yellow and black Courier font. A graphic designer no less! Always be suspicious of someone who sticks ‘conceptualisation’ in a CV. Be very suspicious if they stick the word in five times.
  • Finally, I looked at the PDF version of the CV. One page of a few yellow and grey rectangles. There was no other content.

I’m now off for a lie down.

5

J
u
l
y

2
0
0
4

Hold on

Since I make up 50% of the workforce at my company, I spend a lot of time answering cold calls. Or rather I did, until I signed up for British Telecom’s Anonymous Caller Reject. This rejects all calls from people or organisations that withold their telephone number. I don’t yet know if it works, but today I got a cold call from a woman who did release her number.

This call started off by asking for someone in Marketing. I said, like I do with all cold calls, that we don’t do Marketing. (Replace Marketing with Advertising, Sales, Window Cleaning, whatever, to get my standard response to all such queries.) However, this woman was not detered, and she wittered on for a minute about something or other, which resulted in her stating something like “and you have to put people on hold whilst you work out a quote.”

She seemed to know what our company did, but she was still under the impression that we could provide quotes to people in, say 15-30 seconds (the kind of time one would expect to be put on hold). But, we’re a web design / graphic design company. So, I said that we don’t put people on hold. She was rather surprised, and rang off.

But here’s why we don’t put people on hold:

  1. Much of our meat and potatoes work is for small websites. We have stock prices for these, with simple rates. Give me the number of pages for a website and I can tell you how much it will cost.
  2. For more involved work, we need to work out the costs, primarily because of the engineering work required. This usually requires some investigation, of a day or two of elapsed time. I wouldn’t dare put someone on hold for two days, whilst we work out the pricing!
  3. Other customers require written quotations, so why bother telling them the price over the phone? Just say you’ll pop a quotation in the post, or via e-mail. It’s much more professional and they get a record of what they’re going to be getting, plus it prevents slip ups. We can then follow up with another phone call at our expense.
  4. We don’t like to inconvenience our potential clients. It’s better to discuss their requirements on the phone, and work out the pricing later. They don’t get kept hanging, whilst we make up some numbers. If they’re serious enquiries, they won’t expect a price off the top of our heads.

copyright ©2006 and so on, ninthspace.org, except quotations, lyrics and some images which are the rights of their respective holders