2
8

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

So?

Are Apple losing it? That’s what I think following today’s underwhelming launch of new Mac minis and the iPod Hi-Fi. I’m not a happy bunny.

The new Mac minis are indeed faster than the previous ones, which is great if you want a low cost Mac – although these new minis are more expensive than their predecessors. This time around, the Mac minis come with Front Row. Perhaps that’s why they needed the speed-bump, because when I ran Front Row on my Mac mini I had time to read a book between selections. And still, Front Row doesn’t suit plasma displays. Let’s also not forget the nice new integrated graphics chip that now, shock, horror, shares memory with Mac OS X.

Okay, so perhaps I’m not the target audience for a Mac mini. But I am. I have a Mac mini for my music, the output of which goes to my hi-fi. My Mac mini lives in my lounge. It’s sole purpose is to play music.

And what of the iPod Hi-Fi? Is it really hi-fi? I’ve heard similar devices – those Bose all-in-one systems are reputedly hi-fi. But they aren’t hi-fi. No way on Earth are they hi-fi! They’re just loud. However, I guess they are okay if you live only to listen to U2 24/7.

Would I really replace a hi-fi with an iPod Hi-Fi? No. Would I go scurrying around my computer to load my latest collection of music onto an iPod, then plug it in? No. Would I take the iPod back to my computer every time I purchased a new album? No. Would I sit in front of the iPod Hi-Fi to choose what music I wanted to listen to, fiddle with the menu to get the speaker output, then sit back on my sofa? No. Would I really want to listen to speakers situated just over one feet apart, trying to convince myself it is stereo, also wondering what happened to the top-end frequencies? No.

Here’s some more perspective. My Harman/Kardon Soundsticks cost about half the price of an iPod Hi-Fi. You can position the speakers. They have a frequency response of 44Hz to 20kHz. They are, frankly, brilliant. The iPod Hi-Fi frequency response is 53Hz to 16kHz. And not a tweeter in sight.

This is not good.

2
8

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

New walls?

I’ve just read that you can get free cavity wall insulation when you buy a new boiler from British Gas. I’d like to see them try with my house.

2
8

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

Outside the box

Yesterday I came across this mock up walkthrough of a Microsoft inspired redesign of the iPod box. It’s great.

2
8

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

New Skys

Today, Sky rearranged their channel numbers. I knew this was going to happen, but nothing quite prepared me for an unexpected visit to a weird Sailing channel playing music videos.

Main changes appear to be that all the music channels now start at 340. News 24 is now on 503 not 507. All those peculiar phone-in quiz / chat channels are now placed in amongst the Adult listings, which now comprise quite bizarre collection of channels. This latter change is great because it means that my regular whizz through 101 to 5xx is now not going to be interrupted by scam quizzes and worryingly unattractive women.

And on other matters: why does the strike HTML tag always look so lame and apologetic?

2
7

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

Everything online

In light of Apple’s press conference tomorrow and Microsoft’s launch of Origami on Thursday, I thought it was about time I got together my thoughts on something that’s been bothering me since November last year.

But first, more about Origami. Word is that it’s a lifestyle PC. Yep, we’ve heard that one before. This time it’s small, wearable, always-on and connected. It runs Windows, but that’s not important right now. Back to November…

At this time I was getting frustrated that all the stuff I need to work with lives in different places:

  • E-mails document things I need to do and they also serve as archives of what has happened and who I’ve communicated with. I use GTD categorisation of e-mails so it’s not just Actions that matter.
  • Basecamp has other useful chunks of information: Projects, ToDos, Milestones, Writeboards and Messages. For our business we usually use Basecamp when more than one person is involved. Personal stuff remains personal.
  • Backpack is where I keep casual notes on my work. It’s often easier for me to create or update a page in Backpack than it is to record it elsewhere. I also use Backpack for some occasions when I visit customers.
  • Backpack was also the place I kept my other GTD information, although this has since been replaced by kGTD, which works with OmniOutliner. The essence is still the same, and I still follow the GTD philosophy.
  • Apart from all of the above, the rest of what I need can be simply called ‘Documents’.

From all of this, I perform weekly reviews, I define the work to do in the following week, and I decide what to do each day, using GTD to pick up other things that need addressing as each day progresses. One more thing, I also note things down in a tiny Moleskine notebook.

The big problem with all of this is that everything may need to change, propagate, splice and transfer to one or more of the other places. New items need to be added. Old ones archived or deleted. Links and relationships need to be created, revised and deleted. And it’s mainly done by hand. Some of the information is on my Mac, the remainder is on the web.

We’re currently developing a fairly groovy content management system. Generally, CMSs can cope with various classes of information and each piece of information can be augmented with other data (tags and metadata). All the classes of information I mentioned earlier could be represented in a common format, using tags and additional metadata to differentiate them or add semantics. So it’s possible that everything could be put on the internet. Accessible from anywhere.

One other issue is how it’s organised so that it can be effectively retrieved, sorted, categorised. But, when everything can be tagged or can have metadata added to it, this becomes a relatively simple task. Apple’s Spotlight technology and Microsoft’s new WinFS format both aim to find data outside of the application which created it. Smart Folders are a sensational way of grouping and organising information, and I use them extensively in Apple Mail. It’s all achievable.

If everything is on the internet, there must be an effective way of accessing and manipulating it. Which is where this post began. Mobile and desktop devices could both have the ability to access documents, synchronising where necessary or making live modifications if network connectivity allowed for it.

The revolutionary but short-lived OpenDoc project had the concept of compound documents. Each document was composed of other documents, each class of which had its own viewer and editor. But the overriding problem with OpenDoc was that it was difficult to convert to and from the OpenDoc format and certain companies didn’t want to play with the consortium promoting OpenDoc. Using something similar to the OpenDoc concept would allow a wider range of documents to be manipulated on mobile devices, and you wouldn’t need to download an entire document in order to edit it.

That’s about all I have at the moment on this – there are drawings and other ideas on my Newton, which may pop up in a later post. Origami won’t do anywhere near this, because it’s geared towards talking with other devices, and I have no idea what Apple may eventually do. But what would really suit me is given here.

2
6

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

Content please. Not design.

Content is King. Bill Gate’s essay of 1996 is only holding true for a few select companies that make money from selling content, whilst many of the new generation of internet startups are moving towards interaction rather than content.

Why do I mention this? Because on a small scale, every individual’s website and every business website still needs good content. After eight years in the business, I’m still surprised by the number of business websites that don’t have good, timely content. Many businesses seem satisfied with a static website, with content that never or rarely changes. Our experience is that for non e-Commerce sites, content gets updated perhaps once or twice a year.

To keep websites popular they need to be sticky. Stickiness means that people keep coming back. This keeps them alive and notable to search engines. Customer relationships aren’t cultivated on websites that never get updated. This is even more essential for websites that support or serve a community. And, yes, I’ve seen such websites that just stand still.

When you have a business website, you need to look after it. It’s a unique opportunity to keep in contact with all your current and prospective customers, partners and suppliers. From a marketing perspective, it’s extraordinarily cheap to run. According to the strapline of Naked Conversations, blogs are changing the way businesses talk with customers. Blogs are content too.

So what about design? In our experience, everyone cares about design: websites need to look good and make a memorable impression. Some customers have clear ideas about what the design should look like and how certain parts of the site should behave. Asking people for useful initial content is usually more problematic. The surprise in all of this is that it’s the content they should know about and care about, not the design. We provide the look and feel, the layout, the colours, fonts, graphics, interactivity, web statistics. Leave it all to us. Please, because we still receive invitations to tender where the emphasis is on all of this and not the content.

Whenever we start a website, we need to know what the content will be and how it will grow or evolve. The disappointing fact is that when we start a website, it’s usually the content we know least about. And it’s the content that our customers are least willing or able to supply. We always tell our customers: give us as much information as you can about your business. We need to immerse ourselves in the business being represented, and in some cases we end up being de facto partners.

The content of a website has remarkable consequences on its design. You simply cannot start designing a website without knowing what content will be placed within it. Adherence to the principle of separation of concerns minimises this problem on larger sites, but for a small development that cannot be supported by, for example, a content management system, this isn’t practicable. Without clear direction the whole development process is lengthened, requiring more iterations between design and content. Indeed, some websites may end up having places for content but no content, but it’s the content that counts. It’s always the content that counts.

2
6

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

Willow’s Song

In July 2005, I raved about Sneaker Pimp’s How Do.

Today I tinkered around the iTunes Music Store after reading a review of This Is an Exercise by Anna Oxygen. Anna’s album includes one song that I knew I had, but I couldn’t remember who released it. The song as listed on this album is Willow Song.

Googling, I discovered that it’s a cover of Willow’s Song from the soundtrack of the 1973 film, The Wicker Man. And after doing some more googling, it lead me back to How Do, which is also a cover of the same song.

2
6

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
6

Airwave: The Promise I Made

Airwave’s new triple CD is exactly what you need from ambient trance. The fact it comes out of the Bonzai stable is itself a marque of quality, but the music is exactly right for the genre: there are barely any vocals and it’s easy to tune out whilst doing something else. As Brian Eno once remarked, ambient music can be “actively listened to with attention or as easily ignored, depending on the choice of the listener”.

The Promise I Made appears towards the end of the first CD, and it’s a piece with a distinctive melody that gradually demands your attention.

copyright ©2006 and so on, ninthspace.org, except quotations, lyrics and some images which are the rights of their respective holders