1
4

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Get the message

One week ago, Dr John Sentamu, Archbishop of York, said in an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “The Church has not been very good at clearly spelling out what the message of Jesus is about,” and that “we end up with a culture which is very cynical, blaming somebody else, constantly endeavouring to put other people down.”

Today, four Church of England bishops were signatories to a letter to The Times which criticised Home Office plans to split into two departments.

1
4

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Formalities

  • Andy Rutledge has branched out as a semi-independent designer. His announcement mentions the first little steps down this life, including the creation of business forms. Ah, I remember forms.. One of the many things I left behind when starting Junctionbox Media was forms. Because I quickly discovered that customers don’t like forms. They are barriers to relationships. Invoices, however, I do like. Especially when they get paid. On time.
  • TechCrunch upsets Shannon Terry due to this post about Rivals.com. It’s weird that in the era of blogs, the first stage for many corporate counterarguments still comes in the form of a lawyer’s letter.
  • Mail merges still get done wrong, as per No First Name Matt. It’s not a funny mistake – it’s a big mistake.
1
3

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

The iPhone Excuse

If you needed proof that dropping Computer from Apple Computer, Inc. was a big deal, then yesterday’s announcement that Apple are delaying the release of Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) to October 2007 was that proof.

It’s convenient to use the diversion of resources to work on the iPhone as primary reason for the delay, because it was clear to many, even prior to the announcement of the iPhone, that Leopard wasn’t developing in a way that made the Spring 2007 release date look feasible. I just expected that maybe, unlike most other tech companies, expected shipping dates ended up being actuals.

Apple have now put “key” Mac OS X people on the iPhone, hence the delay to Mac OS X 10.5. That’s fine for me, because the iPhone is definitely the bigger deal. And let’s face it, Mac OS X 10.4 is, bar a few niggles, a fine operating system.

In my experience, when one project vital to a company looks like slipping, that company assigns inexperienced people from other projects in order to retain the original shipping date. That date is met, then we get into the “repent at leisure” phase, which basically re-does all the stuff done by these extra people. But, at least we can state that we met our milestone, huh?

Apple have, according to the press release, assigned “key” people, which I hope means that the initial iPhone launch will be successful. Because with something this revolutionary, Apple will only get one chance to get it right.

Update: in any case, during the summer months you should be outside, not stuck indoors drooling over a new software package. Our friends in the US can be outside, drooling over their new iPhone instead.

5

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Robyn: Cobrastyle

Fi-na-lly!

The general opinion of Stylus Magazine was such that it was rated No. 4 in their albums of 2005. Two years on, Robyn is released in the UK, a whole 10 years after the arrival of Show Me Love, and sparkling with some extra tracks – including the previously-blogged-about and yes-it’s-magnificently-shimmeringly-aching With Every Heartbeat. Robyn’s album bursts with the all knowing pizazz that a pop diva should have. The vocals, the lyrics, the zaps, stabs, beats and arrangements combine to tell us two things: that love hurts, sometimes, and that pop music is crucial to the successful evolution of the human race.

[Amazon UK]
[Cobrastyle – from The Rakamonie EP – iTunes UK]
[Robyn – Stylus Magazine Review]
[Robyn – Pitchfork Review]

3

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Not Yesterday?

Opinions on yesterday’s EMI and Apple announcement:

  • The BBC emphasises the relationship with piracy, referring to statements by EMI such as “Consumers tell us they would be prepared to pay a higher price for a piece of music they can play on any player” and “We have to trust our consumers.” I don’t believe that EMI believes those statements. Truth is that the price hike is to compensate EMI for anticipated consequential piracy, and to allow them to sell their music with a 30% price increase.
  • Read/Write agrees that prices are going to go up, and that despite the win-win situation for Apple and EMI, it may well be Apple that gains the most long term.
  • MacWorld’s Playlist however, suggests that everyone, including consumers, benefit from this agreement – the death of DRM. Their opinion identifies some ‘losers’ – notably the smaller online stores that use DRM.
  • MacWorld looks forward to the future of digital music sales, pointing out the current annoyances with the iTunes Store, in particular those lovely Partial Albums and Album Only tracks.
2

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Smart and Stupid

Apple and EMI announced at 1pm BST today that EMI’s entire digital catalogue is going to be made available on iTunes, and other stores, without DRM from May 2007. EMI are obviously hoping that this gives them an advantage over other record companies, and Apple expect this to drive more traffic to their online store, away from their competitors. The former is a temporary advantage, because other labels will follow, and they have time to. The iTunes Store will be the first online store to sell EMI’s content DRM-free, which could cause many people to permanently switch to using iTunes.

The DRM issue that Steve Jobs raised in an open letter released in February is a trojan horse. You see, it’s not DRM that’s killing the major labels, it’s piracy carried out by those who don’t value music. I’ll say it again: it’s not DRM that’s killing the major labels, it’s low quality audio downloads. But those who don’t value music probably don’t care about low quality audio. EMI are however going to be selling their DRM-free music via iTunes at double the audio quality. But this comes at a price:

Individual tracks that are encoded at this higher quality will be more expensive: $1.29 per track, rather than $0.99. Although, curiously, entire albums will not incur the premium. You can upgrade previous purchases for the $0.30 per track difference. Furthermore, you’ll still be able to buy DRM’d content at the lower price. Can anyone not spot this as a move to higher pricing? Therefore, how does this stop piracy? The truth is that removing DRM helps Apple alone, not just in more iTunes purchases, but enabling everyone to play that music on iPods regardless of where they purchased it from. Remember – the whole purpose of the iTunes Store is to sell iPods.

The whole interoperability issue – people wanting to play all their music anywhere and on anything – is a red herring. If someone can’t be bothered to re-rip and import a DRM protected album into their player of choice, then they clearly don’t think that the effort is worth it: so the music must be poor, or maybe music just ain’t that important.

Some passing notes: What the industry needs is a wholesale replacement of the CD: this means high quality, DRM-free music with high quality artwork and readable sleeve notes. Music should be released from the confines of its CD heritage, and opened up. It’s time that music got genuinely sociable (imagine how great a last.fm / iTunes integrated store would be) and it’s time that music got decommodified.

1

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Lunik: Life is on Our Side

Number 10 of 2006 — Lunik: Life is on Our Side

snipshot_d413u6fimv0p2.jpg
Live albums are usually the preserve of three groups of musicians: Taking the first two: there are those who feel a need to close a stage of their career and there are those who use it as a tool to reinvigorate a career, or to make some money. The third and final group splits into two subgroups, both use this mechanism as a way of distinguishing the live experience from the studio. One subgroup uses it to solely express the live experience (e.g. Underworld’s tremendous Everything Everything CD and DVD), the other subgroup uses it to express their musical prowess, i.e. that they’re real musicians. For example, the set of Tori AmosThe Original Bootlegs – 6 double CDs covering the 2005 Original Sinsuality tour, belongs here (and those who were bemused by the rationale for releasing six live albums fails to understand the meaning of the word ‘live’ in this context, and indeed Tori as an artist).

Swiss band Lunik, released Life is on Our Side in 2004. It is, barring one studio recording, a live album, taken from the tour to support Weather. Lunik’s third album, released in 2003, marked their departure from the electronica of Rumour and Ahead, becoming more acoustic. It was therefore a natural consequence to record and release a live album. And it too lives in this last group. You might assume that bands that produce pop music don’t do live very well. Life is on Our Side successfully disputes this assumption and as a result, leaves the listener with a better understanding of Lunik as a band and as individuals. It is an album which exposes their potential to become as astounding as The Cardigans.

The essential factor in a live performance is to avoid replicating what’s previously been recorded. Life is on Our Side embraces this fundamentally, and allows them to gently experiment with the arrangement and delivery of each song. Unfortunately, as a result, it shows up the deficiencies in opening track and single Summer’s Gone. The studio recording simply lacks the emotional impact and intimacy of the rest of the album. The lead up to the chorus and the chorus is fine, but this pop instinct shaves away the humanity leaving something best left to supermarkets. Even playing the melancholy card doesn’t work here because it’s too plodding.

Not that I’m totally adverse to strummed guitars: New Day is the first live track. The first verse is just Jaël’s voice and a guitar. Her vocals are now more forward and are beautifully recorded. But it’s not until the second verse, when the rest of the band come in that this live experience turns into something more precious. This is, essentially, the best forum for their music. And it’s staggering. There’s no need for intricate production or backing vocals. Just letting the songs live through the performance is enough. The other guys, Luk Zimmermann (lead guitar), Cédric Saurer (keyboards), Jacob Suske (bass) and Mats Marti on drums all perform excellently. Jaël supports with rhythm guitar.

So what about the scary swing time of Size? Well, it works, but perhaps it appears too early on the album. Are we quite ready for an improvised piano break and brushed drums? Maybe not. But it does mark Lunik up as a collective of professional musicians who aren’t afraid to experiment. Another minor stylistic switch occurs later on in What You Are, just with the way a guitar line is played, separating the verse and chorus. It underpins the verse, but then sits back during the chorus. Oh, and there’s an improvised break too.

A recorded live album, lives and dies by its performance. It’s too easy to fall into presenting each song in a similar way, and in this instance the songs are not enough. The challenge is to be different. The demonstration of Lunik’s live capabilities build from the third track, Size, because Weather is almost as anthemic as it can get. It helps having a singer who can truly sing live, and boy, Jaël’s absolutely amazing throughout the album.

But you do need songs. The performance isn’t everything. In the studio you can cosset a weak song in paraphernalia, you can drench a bad vocal performance in effects. You can’t do much live, apart from the general fix of adding reverb. If anything, Life is on Our Side shows that Lunik’s songs are better without this trickery. The subtle keyboard pad on Slide, and the emphasised guitar line underlines the emotion of the track.

After the quiet thankful reflection of Backup, comes the bouncy jazz of Lie, which betrays the sadness of the song “And it’s a lie that I don’t need / Your company anymore / But I will not bleed / Even though it hurts”. This time, it’s the piano’s turn to fiddle around in the break. Democracy in action, huh?

Through Your Eyes
is an immense song in any setting. The prolonged intro serves to tease, because it is their best song. Jaël’s vocals take a turn for the more broken and fragile, and the instrumental backing become more subtle. “I don’t deserve you, it’s so hard to believe that you are really in love with me.” As with any traditional live album, this is a time when the audience comes into play, because we get the inevitable crowd chorus. But as a musical device – it’s a double break – it works marvellously. It’s exactly what the song needs. A connection between audience and band, taking an alternate meaning of the song. Rightly, it marks the end of the main act.

The song played as an encore is the short and sweet Other Side, and the album closes with new song Serenity performed in a live setting, but curiously without an audience. The latter has obvious acoustic differences from the rest of the album, so it could be a live recording with post-production overdubs – the backing vocals are clues to this.

Every time I listen to this album, my opinion of it grows – it’s emotionally and musically rewarding. If you love music you really should have this album in your collection.

[Life is on Our Side – iTunes UK]

1

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

Tina Dico: Break of Day

It could well be that everyone went ga ga over Tina’s album In The Red. I did. But before that were two previous albums: 2001’s Fuel and Notes, which followed two years later, both released on her Finest Gramophone record label. These are now available on iTunes UK.

Break of Day comes from Notes, and is built on the simplest one note bass, to point out the chords, accompanied by meandering, minimal, percussive guitar. This mood changes towards the climax of the song, when acoustic guitar is added, and Tina’s backing vocals come in. The overall feel is that of organic intelligent dance music. It’s magnificent.

[Fuel – iTunes UK]
[Notes – iTunes UK]

copyright ©2006 and so on, ninthspace.org, except quotations, lyrics and some images which are the rights of their respective holders